Battlefield 6 Achieves 300+ FPS with Ryzen 9800X3D and RTX 5080 Combo, But Experiences Nearly 33% FPS Drop with Intel Core i9 14900K

Battlefield 6, huh? So, I’m scrolling through whatever and I stumble upon this little nugget from a streamer named Bruhskey. Apparently, he’s boasting about getting 300+ fps in Battlefield 6 with his Ryzen 7 9800X3D processor. Yeah, 300-plus — let that sink in for a second. Pretty wild if you ask me.

Anyway, he says if you’re rocking a 300Hz gaming monitor, you might just enjoy what he’s talking about. Mind you, he doesn’t have the screenshots or gameplay videos to back it up, but he seems confident. Now, I’m not typically into these technical mumbo jumbo discussions, but I get why this stuff matters.

Bruhskey’s setup? A Ryzen 7 9800X3D with an RTX 5080. Sounds like a dream rig. The kind anyone chasing high fps would drool over. Yet, it makes you wonder, why can’t Intel keep up? His buddy, using an i9 14900K — another beast of a CPU — could barely reach the same heights. Almost 30% less fps, he claims. That’s a pretty big gap, right? No idea why Intel can’t seem to catch up here. Maybe it’s about that L3 cache magic AMD’s packing. Who knows?

He mentions playing mostly on some map called Cairo, whatever that is, and I can’t help but think — is there more to this? Like, were other settings tweaked or whatever? The tweet hints there weren’t any frame gen tricks used, but it’s still hard to imagine. 1440p with 300 fps is like catching lightning in a bottle. Seems all too good to be true if you ask me. But the latency he talks about — 6.7 nanoseconds? That’s like hummingbird-fast or something.

So, what’s the takeaway here? If Bruhskey’s not just blowing smoke, then maybe X3D CPUs are the real game-changers. But let’s not get too carried away. Until there’s concrete proof — video, screenshots, or otherwise — it’s just a tale of numbers. Still, a fun one to ponder. I mean, wouldn’t it be nice if every game ran buttery smooth like that? I can dream, can’t I?